“The decision whether or not to terminate a pregnancy is essentially a moral decision and in a free and democratic society, the conscience of the individual must be paramount to that of the state,” O’Connor said. (Source)
The conscience is above the State, but it is not above the natural law. It is not above the moral law which says that no one may murder.
But then again, we know where O’Connor is getting this conscience thing, don’t we?
26. Counsellors may meet others who, accepting the teaching of the Holy Father, find that because of particular circumstances they are involved in what seems to them a clear conflict of duties, e.g., the reconciling of conjugal love and responsible parenthood with the education of children already born or with the health of the mother. In accord with the accepted principles of moral theology, if these persons have tried sincerely but without success to pursue a line of conduct in keeping with the given directives, they may be safely assured that, whoever honestly chooses that course which seems right to him does so in good conscience.
This entry was posted on Sunday, April 29th, 2012 at 10:20 pm and is filed under Abortion, Catholic Scandals, Contraception. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
I never thought of the connection to the Winnipeg Statement when I read his comments. That’s a great point.