You know, when I was in the sixth grade, a fellow student was describing an account of how another kid was getting somewhat physically abusive towards him. After putting up with his taunts and pushing, this fellow proceeded to describe how he clocked him one right in the face. One punch and the guy went down. I chuckled to myself, but the janitor who was also listening to the story was a real peace-nic and said that “violence doesn’t solve anything”. My friend stoically replied, “Maybe. But that guy won’t be bothering me anymore.” I laughed some more.
Well, check out what happens when some stupid fool tries the same thing here. He got more than what he bargained for and so did his companion. If the law is a teacher, then so is a bit of “physical chivalry” when the circumstances warrant.
What is it with these people; have they no integrity at all?
I’ll tell you exactly what a liberal is: a liberal is person who, when push comes to shove, will never stand up for their beliefs if it’s going to cost them personally. That, my dear readers, is what defines a liberal.
If they can’t get it through their policies, they will make sure they can make exceptions in the rare cases that their policies require sacrifice of them.
As the Canadian government seeks to deport war criminals, mass executioners and death squad leaders who have lied in order to enter Canada, Amnesty International is raising a stink about it. Read Margaret Wente insightful take on the issue here.
Of course, everybody, even criminals, are entitled to due process and a fair hearing. That’s not the issue here. These criminals have already been heard and found guilty. Now it’s time to boot them out before they do some damage in our country.
You might be astounded that Amnesty International would be standing up for these thugs. How can this possibly happen? I’ll tell you how. Amnesty International has gotten too big and fat. They’re over-funded. They’ve grown even while many countries have turned from dictatorships to democracies in recent decades. So the over-staffed organization has to chase around for lesser crimes in order to keep themselves busy. When you see them starting to stand up for guys who ran firing quads, you know that the apple has indeed fallen far from the tree. Read the rest of this entry »
There are 3.5 million children from broken homes in Britain. Their growing numbers, and the effect on of family breakdown on children, caused a leading family law court judge, Sir Paul Coleridge, to recently describe the scale of the problem as “social anarchy” and to urge the government to work to promote marriage. (Source)
But they are, Judge! Haven’t you heard about how Britain is going to be legalizing gay “marriage” pretty darn soon. Like c’mon!
They’re doing what they can. That will fix the problem, for sure.
…Looking at his Facebook profile, one immediately notices Breivik’s strong interest in Freemasonry and his photograph in full Masonic regalia. The apron identifies him as a member of a St. John’s Lodge of the Norwegian Order of Freemasons, the “regular” Masonic obedience in Norway. The circumstance that he was indeed a member of the Søilene St. John’s Lodge in Oslo has been confirmed by the Order, which proceeded to expel Breivik only after his imprisonment. St. John’s Lodges administer the first three Craft degrees and operate under the Swedish rite. Of course, no Fundamentalist would enthusiastically endorse Freemasonry as Breivik did. In addition, Breivik was a fan of online and offline role-playing games such as World of Warfcraft, Fallout and Bioshock and of the TV vampire serial Blood Ties, all anathema to the average Fundamentalist.
It is also true that, while endorsing in his book a traditional, patriarchal, male-dominated family, Breivik also mentions that in preparation of the attack “I have reserved 2000 Euro from my operations budget which I intend to spend on a high quality model escort girl 1 week prior to execution of the mission”, and explains that “screwing around outside of marriage is after all a relatively small sin”. No fundamentalist would subscribe to this theory, and all fundamentalists condemn abortion without exceptions. Breivik, on the other hand, is favorable to abortion “if the baby has mental or physical disabilities” and in some other cases, although he regards abortion in general as a negative phenomenon. On document.no he boasts about his friendship with the developer of the website “Deiligst.no, Norway’s probably the most profitable online communities despite the frayed moral concept”. Deiligst is a Web site devoted to promote casual sexual encounters….(Source)
Like I said in my earlier post, he’s essentially a deranged liberal who is honest about what is happening in Europe.
The Globe is so devoid of real arguments that they have to make borderline defamatory insinuations to put conservative commentators on the defensive. They’re basically saying that writers like Mark Steyn or anybody else who has used strong language to voice concerns about Islam in the West are somehow implicated in the shooter’s actions.
The Globe’s language is very subtle and carefully chosen so as to avoid any libel suit, but the implied link and the desire to put conservatives on the defensive is undeniable.
Read their junk here. Or better, don’t bother. Don’t give them the satisfaction of an extra hit on their website.