Remember that old 70′s movie called Soylent Green? It was a sci-fi flick starring Charlton Heston. The movie was set in 2022, which must have seemed like the distant future to them at the time, but it’s just around the corner for us.

The name of the movie comes from the small green wafers, produced by Soylent Corporation, that served as the main source of food. They were supposed to be made of high-energy plankton, but as the movie progresses, you discover that they’re made of human remains. Pretty gross.

Well, it turns out that Soylent Green isn’t just for 2022. It’s already happening in 2012:

News outlets are reporting that thousands of capsules filled with powdered flesh from dead babies have been seized by South Korean customs officials. (Source)

Say what? Read the rest of this entry »

The Exodus has begun.

It’s time to move in for the kill.

Even the CBC, of all people, is reporting on the public furor over the sex-hibition at the Museum of Science and Technology. Check it out:

Canada’s Science and Technology Museum in Ottawa has raised the age limit for admission to a controversial sex exhibit after dozens of complaints about the content.

As well, animated video informing children about masturbation has been removed.

The moves followed complaints about the exhibit called Sex: A Tell-All Exhibition.

“The museum has received a higher-than-expected amount of expressions of concerns from the public,” spokesman Yves St-Onge told Reuters. (Source)

Reuters? Good grief! You mean the whole world now knows about this? They must think Canadians are a bunch of pervs!

Heritage Minister James Moore spoke out against the exhibit during Question Period, but his spokesman went even further:

Moore’s spokesman, James Maunder, had earlier said the purpose of the Museum of Science and Technology is to foster scientific and technological literacy.

“It is clear this exhibit does not fit within that mandate,” Maunder told CBC News. “Its content cannot be defended, and is insulting to taxpayers.”

My sentiments exactly.

I even saw CBC covering it on TV this evening! Clearly we’ve rocked the boat big time. Give credit to the Ottawa Sun for doing an excellent article on it yesterday, from which I drew inspiration for my complaint to the government.

For those of you that haven’t complained yet, give yourself the satisfaction of dealing the fatal blow. My earlier post gives you the email addresses you need.

OTTAWA, Ontario, May 17, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Canada’s federal government says a tax-funded “tell-all” sex exhibit at Ottawa’s Museum of Science and Technology “cannot be defended” and they are calling on LifeSiteNews readers to complain to the museum. The raunchy exhibit at Ottawa’s Museum of Science and Technology, which encourages youth to practice anal sex and advertises that 14-year-old children can obtain abortions without parents’ permission, sparked an uproar this week in the run-up to its Thursday opening. One of the sections of the sex exhibit displays dildos covered by condoms. The museum falls under the jurisdiction of the federal government’s Ministry of Canadian Heritage and receives about $30 million per year in funding from taxpayers….(Source)

$30 Million for a Museum that sponsors Condom application over Dildos?  The Conservative Government couldn’t find any more savings in the budget, eh?

We’re in a deficit position, our health care is going down the tubes, our seniors are getting their OAS cut back, people are losing their jobs, and we’re funding how to orgasm?

WTF is this? 

I can tell you something. If I was elected PM, the Dildo enthusiasts, abortion-pushers, and everyone else who makes a living off of sterile orgasm would be on the street without a dime in public funds.

Here’s my letter to Tony Clement, President of the Treasury Board (tony.clement@parl.gc.ca), with a c.c. to the Prime Minister (pm@pm.gc.ca). I suggest our readers point out the abortion connection to the Prime Minister. That’ll get his attention You can also write to the Heritage Minister, James Moore (james.moore@pch.gc.ca)

Hon. Tony Clement
President of the Treasury Board

cc. Prime Minister Stephen Harper

Dear Tony,

I appreciate the efforts you’re making to cut unnecessary spending and balance the budget. However, I’m greatly distressed that taxpayer money is being used to fund a sex-hibition at Ottawa’s Museum of Science and Technology. The official name is “Sex: A Tell-all Exhibition”, but the content is very disturbing.

The “Erecto-matic” display contains a felt dissection of part of a limp penis. Press a button and the penis becomes erect. Is this how our hard-earned taxes should be employed?

Then there’s a display with a picture of two girls around the age of 13 pressed together naked, looking at the camera as if the viewer has just discovered them showering. Most normal Canadians would call this child porn. Do you want to be bankrolling this crap?

Then there’s the abortion issue. There are two audio stations where you can press a button to receive an answer from a health professional to a series of prepared questions. One question asks what to do if you’re pregnant with an unwanted child. The woman simply explains that in Quebec you can have an abortion without parental consent at the age of 14. She does not mention adoption. Since when is the federal government in the business of counseling abortions? I thought the Prime Minister didn’t want to talk about abortion?

Tony, even in the best of times this spending would be an outrage.  But at a time when the government is cutting more than $5 billion in annual spending and laying off thousands of public servants, this spending is just plain insulting.

As you know, museums will be flooded with kids on Canada Day, as admission is free and parents have the day off. I trust you can put an end to this disgrace before then.

Sincerely,

From a reader…

Dear friends,

On May 14th, 2012, the Canada Science and   Technology museum will open their latest exhibit “Sex: A Tell-all Exhibition”   which will remain there until January 2013.  On May   7th and May 9th, between 5pm and 7pm, educators (and parents) can preview this   exhibition for free.  They are looking for feedback.   According to the website, there will be a sign above the exhibit before   entering, clarifying children aged 12 and under require parental   accompaniment. (Update: the museum is now posting staff members at the entrance to ensure under-age children do not enter).  Here is a link from the museum explaining  a little bit about what the exhibit will be about Read the rest of this entry »

Just how sick can you be?

When the final decision comes down enforcing women bishops on the remaining conservatives in the Church of England, it’s going to be a rather large wave of converts coming into the Ordinariate.

Benedict XVI kills three birds with one smooth stone: 

1) uniting true Christians under Rome’s banner;

2) hastening the demise of liberal “Christianity” in the Church of England’

3) giving the liberal-dominated English Catholic episcopacy in the Latin Rite some competition for the Faithful (My guess is that within 2-3 generations, either the bishops of England sober up and start teaching the Catholic Faith or the Bishops of the Ordinariate simply replace them completely)

Within a generation, the Church of England and its liberal comrades in the U.S. are finished. The only thing left will be their money which will be given to some “charitable” cause, advancing eco-worship or the lastest social justice cause.

Frankly, I’m amazed at how blind sin can truly make you.  It’s not like these liberal congregations are bursting at the seams. They all practice safe, sterilized sex. Either with a condom or a private part not capable of reproduction.

No kids, no life, no future.  Just one final orgasm, before the last goodbye.

…Yet, I venture to say the overturning of classical morality that we are witnessing in our time with ever increasing force and speed has been largely made possible by the elevation of compassion, sincerity, and sensitivity to the rank of moral absolutes. They have taken the place of what it is we should be compassionate, sincere, and sensitive about. Today, we are used to people who kill their babies in the womb, or advocate it, or make it legally possible and what not. Yet, these same people are indignant when someone identifies just what it is that they have done or cooperated in or made possible. We are robbed of the language in which truth and accuracy is contained. We assign babies to single-sex couples because the “couples,” not the child, “need” them. The child needs a mother and a father. We kill the elderly or encourage them to kill themselves to lessen their suffering as if suffering or caring for them has no purpose. We want to be compassionate. We want to “feel” with the one who “suffers.” With such feelings, we are led to do terrible things and insist on calling them good.”

Good eats, over here.

From Lilley…

It is a victory for common sense, a victory for the taxpayers.

CBC has gone soft on Hard.

You remember Hard, the pornographic show from France that CBC used your tax dollars to purchase the Canadian rights to. They then posted the program on the Internet because apparently they think there is not enough smut online.

We’ll they have changed course and pulled out of their relationship with French pornographers.

When we broke the story we showed you just a portion of the racy video because when we spoke to people about the fact that CBC was showing porn, many people did not believe us.

Even after we showed the first batch or video, all from one online program, many did not believe us.

Then we showed footage from another episode, this one an orgy. There was little doubt left that CBC, the state broadcaster had turned into filth peddlers. Read more…

Don’t matter. We’re gonna cut you off, anyway.  Sooner or later, the CBC is going to go impotent….forever.

An advocacy group in Ireland has announced that it conducted a survey in which 18% of respondents claimed that their doctors “behaved inappropriately” – including “sexual abuse” – during medical treatments.

The scale of sexual abuse by medical practitioners against patients could be far worse than scandals that rocked the Catholic Church, it was claimed yesterday.

So begins an article today (Wed., 3/7/12) on this matter in the Irish Examiner.

The Examiner reports that an organization named Dignity 4 Patients is calling for a government inquiry into the apparent widespread sexual abuse of patients by doctors.

Bernadette Sullivan, the group’s executive director, is quoted in the article:

“The scale of numbers a doctor can abuse, as compared to a priest, are huge,” said the former nurse-turned-whistleblower.

Ms. Sullivan also challenged why her group does not receive the same level of financial support as groups who support abuse victims in other areas of society.

“To fail to provide adequate funding to Dignity 4 Patients is to further discriminate, marginalise and neglect patient victims,” Sullivan told the Examiner. “This in itself is abuse.”

Well, it sure seems Sullivan was smart to raise her group’s profile by connecting her issue to abuse in the Catholic Church! That is how you get the media’s attention! (Source)

If it doesn’t involve the Catholic Church, the MSM is not interested in reporting about sexual abuse. 

It’s a private issue, you see, between a woman and her doctor.

Not that this is a big surprise, mind you.  But it does bears repeating for the dumb and dumber who are so inclined to still believe the mainstream media is “fair and balanced”.

The lowest, lowest place in hell is reserved for journalists of the MSM.

You would think that when a cabinet minister of any political party was asked about a government body broadcasting pornography and using tax dollars to do that, they might be a little shocked and demand answers.

Not current Conservative MP and Heritage Minister James Moore:  He attacked the messenger.  “I know you’re in the business of just going after the CBC, but I can’t comment on something I haven’t seen,” Moore told QMI Agency reporter Kris Sims when asked about CBC’s French arm showing pornographic material on one of its websites.

…

First, he’s responsible for CBC, which is using tax dollars to import pornography from France to post on its website. As if the Internet didn’t have enough porn to begin with. By dodging questions and attacking the messenger, Moore is dodging responsibility.

…

Asking about CBC paying a private firm in France for the rights to broadcast porn on a government-owned website is a legitimate line of questioning.
…

With Wednesday’s response, he has shown that even when it comes to taxpayers funding smut, he’d rather attack a reporter and a private media outlet than question his cherished state broadcaster. (Source)

It’s a very sad day indeed to see the Conservative Party sink so low that they don’t even have the moral backbone to resist the open, tax-payer funded smut by the porn-pushers at the CBC. We know that Stephen Harper will never, ever open the abortion debate or tackle any social issue that is even remotely contentious.  But failing to deal with state-sponsored porn?  Just how limpy can you be, Steve?  Is this your idea of Canadian culture and fiscal prudence, Mr. Moore?  Blow jobs on our dime? Read the rest of this entry »

This doesn’t affect social conservatives, obviously, who advocate and practice sex only within true marriage.

But, as far as the other side goes, well, it’s kind of hard to find out which side they will fall on.

On the one hand, the demented liberals will agree that such “persecution” should stop.

Then again, it’s their bacon on the line, so self-interest plays a big role too in getting full disclosure before any sexual encounter.

This is a perfect example of how liberalism and sin end up destroying its own constituency.

My sincere prayer this Holy Season is for some disburbed man to enter a stall where a Feminist is changing.

It only seems right and just.  They wanted it. Let them share in all that these wonderful “equality” laws have to offer.

…In the Notification, which is addressed to his clergy, to teaching Sisters, to members of Catholic Action and to “Educators intending truly to follow Christian doctrine”, the cardinal noted that by 1960 many respectable women and mothers in Genoa had stopped wearing dresses and skirts and had taken to wearing “men’s dress (men’s trousers)”. He recognises that trousers might not be thought of as immodest “because they cover more of a woman’s body than do modern women’s skirts” – unless, of course, they are provocatively tight-fitting. His main point, however, is to do with the psychology of women wearing trousers: he believes “Male dress is the visible aid to bringing about a mental attitude of being ‘like a man’” ie it changes the psychology of women.

Cardinal Siri’s argument is that “male dress tends to vitiate relationships between men and women”; when women wear trousers, it flattens out the natural distinction between the sexes and thus helps “to pull down the vital defence-works of the sense of shame”. He believes, in short, that “the changing of feminine psychology does fundamental, and in the long run, irreparable damage to the family, to conjugal fidelity, to human affections and to human society.”… (Source)

Death by increments.  The old fuddy-duddy was right, wasn’t he?  I can hear the howls of cynical laughter already…but the reality is that changing a woman’s appearance is the first “benign” step to changing the woman and robbing her of her genuine feminity later on.

In the past, we knew who wore the pants in the family.  Today, of course, women wear the pants and men wear dresses.  But for some reason, no one’s laughing at that.  It’s a hate crime to oppose it.