Orthodox Coming Out SwingingPosted on May 16th, 2012 by Paycheck in Catholic Education, Homosexuality, Religious Persecution
This is the kind of direct questions that we need more of from our Clergy. Good on the Orthodox for asking the hard questions. It’s time to push back. And the politicians really do need to understand that imposing Gaydom on our children will have political repercussions. Only when we start taking ourselves seriously will the politicians start to pay attention. It’s time for Christians to stop being the doormat of Dalton McGuinty.
Contraception and the loss of religious freedomPosted on May 16th, 2012 by Paycheck in Catholic Scandals, Contraception
The only real solution to the crisis of publicly funded Catholic schooling in Canada. Good on Fr. Anthony. Great priest. Takes no bull but delivers the hard truth with charity. Chinese Study: ‘Women with a Previous Induced Abortion Had a Significant Increased Risk of Breast Cancer’Posted on May 16th, 2012 by Paycheck in AbortionFrom the “Abortion is the BEST thing going” files….
The time is ripe for faithful Catholics, especially in the US, to approach the clergy and humbly ask them to preach about sexual morality. Think about it: the tone of the discourse of the US bishops towards Obama’s abortion/contraception mandate is rapidly approaching a feverish pitch. Some weeks ago we heard the call for a national day of fasting on March 30. Then the USCCB released a blunt statement in April on this issue. Now they’re calling for civil disobedience. Clearly, the bishops are setting this up as the greatest battle of our age. And rightfully so. So why aren’t they preaching about it from the pulpit? They’ve spun the issue of paying for contraception and abortion as a matter of fundamental religious freedom. Fair enough. Given how much noise they’re making, any non-Catholic outsider would logically conclude that these issues are a central part of the Catholic Faith, as opposed to accessory parts of Catholicism, like the colours of priestly vestments on different feast days. Yet, if this same non-Catholic outsider were to sit in a Catholic pew every day for a year, he’d never hear a peep about contraception and maybe only one or two mentions of abortion. Does it make sense that I hear more about birth control on CNN than in our churches? The bishops tell us that we have to be willing to go to the rack over these issues, but they dare not mention these same issues at Mass? Read the rest of this entry » Enforcing secularity in the Pro-Life MovementPosted on May 15th, 2012 by Paycheck in Catholicism, Pro-Life Activism
Above is an email that I received about my push for having a Eucharistic procession and benediction on Parliament Hill. While I certainly respect the idea of having all Christians and non-Christians alike join in the abortion battle, the idea that Catholics (or any Faith group, for that matter) have to somehow check their spirituality at the door is rooted in a false ecumenism. Do not all Christians suffer from the complaint by the Secularists? “Keep your religion out of politics.” If we Christians reject this idea, then we should also reject the same principle when it applies to our intramural differences, as well. It’s the same deadly logic that seeks to impose an artificial unity. We, as Catholics, are on Parliament Hill principally because we are Catholic. So why should we hide our distinct spirituality because it offends non-Catholics? First of all, we’re 90-95% of the people who show up for the March for Life every year. That alone makes this “you may give offense” charge, offensive in itself! Secondly, no Catholic would feel offended if other Christians or non-Christians wanted to express the reason for their participation, either. And remember, folks, I am not even suggesting having the Eucharistic event during the actual March itself. Heaven forbid! I am simply saying, “We Catholics brought abortion in to this country. We Catholics have to do our part to take it out, in our own way.” I repeat: this is a spiritual battle which must be won in that realm, first, before it translates into sociological and political victory. “I’m personally pro-choice, but…”Posted on May 15th, 2012 by Squeaker in Canadian Politics, Pro-Life ActivismWe’ve all heard many politicians use cowardly cop-outs while conceding ground to the Culture of Death. One of the classic lines is “I’m personally opposed to [insert depravity here], but I can’t impose my beliefs on others.” Well, the shoe was on the other foot last week for the March for Life. Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson proclaimed May 10th as “Respect for Life Day” in Ottawa, as he did last year. This triggered some angry reactions from a few pro-choicers, who attacked the mayor on Facebook and Twitter. The mayor’s response was a new twist on a familiar theme: Read the rest of this entry » Pro-Abort Votes Are Behind the BarracadesPosted on May 14th, 2012 by Paycheck in Abortion, Conservative Party, Pro-Life ActivismAll 50 of them took off just before the March started down Ottawa’s streets. So, uh, Mr. Harper, I assume you can count. What are you afraid of? Media hype and people who don’t even show? What makes you think they’ll show up on Election night, either? The “Conservative” Party really does need to learn how to count. Is it time to quit or join the Catholic Church?Posted on May 14th, 2012 by Paycheck in Catholicism, Religious Persecution
The Catholic Church has been sleeping for the past 40 years, getting fat and lazy, and becoming too damn cozy with the State to the point where we were becoming the department of social justice within the government. Obama has changed all that. He is indeed the gift that keeps on giving. He very well might be the single most important cause for the resurgence of the Catholic Church. For that, we all must be very grateful.
I think this might one of the few times that I’ve heard a Canadian bishop actually publicly engage the lame pro-abort arguments. One of the objectives of Cardinal Ouellet is to choose bishops who actually defend the faith, instead of having an emphasis on being “pastoral”. I think pastoral went out in the 70s but has hung around 40 years too long. Anyhow, from a Faith and sociological perspective, +Prendergast certainly does a great job. I’ve got my own pithy responses to this “my body, my choice” argument: 1. If it’s your body and your choice, why is my wallet involved? 2. If it’s your choice, why is your boyfriend making the decision to abort for you? 3. If it’s your body, why does “your body” have two heads, two sets of arms and legs, two hearts and two of everything that we would otherwise not expect to find in one human body? 4. If it’s your choice, why does the abortion lobby do everything in its power to ensure that it’s not informed? 5. If it’s your body, what’s with the sperm in it? 6. If it’s your choice, it’s the slave owner’s choice too. Chattel is chattel, after all. 7. If it’s your body, what organ or appendage are they dumping in the abortion bag after the “procedure”? 8. If it’s your choice, then it’s your tragic consequence too. Abortion destroys the lives of women. Not all choices are created equal. 9. If it’s your body, why was your first child not as lucky as your second? 10. If it’s your choice, why did that baby all of a sudden become a “product of conception” when you changed your choice? Fr. Dwight’s story here. |











Entries (RSS)